Unit's friend and colleague Roberto Rossi wrote a book, Bin nuclear , that I recommend. We talked to Rainews 24 transmission Maurizio Torrealta. Roberto talks about nuclear
starting from criminal investigations, a circumstance which in itself is indicative of how it was managed the country's nuclear (especially after the referendum): delays, waste, fraud and a few escaped some danger too. The book puts the question at the center of the deposit of waste: the list of 50 possible points made by Sogin twenty years ago has not changed much and Basilicata (Scanzano and above all, says Rossi, Craco ) is always the candidate most reliable.
The deposit must be made even if you never make new plants, the waste should be placed second and third category of old plants and those produced daily by hospitals and industry. Build a structure over controlled and safe way to meet the highest international standards would interest those who want to rebuild the industry, because it would give credibility to any project. But environmentalists, at least those in the literal sense, that is, who is concerned about the ecosystem effects of something as dangerous as radioactive materials, should urgently ask that the hundreds of makeshift stores that are in the Italian provinces are closed and rationalized. The government should undertake to supervise and ensure the maximum transparency of management over the years.
Instead it's all in reverse: the atom excited to "be" disappeared "the waste from the scene promising shortcuts as unlikely as dangerous (" mandiamole in Russia "," stocchiamole in Albania "), convinced that no one will ever accept a deposit in Italy, while the central consensus-c 'is more likely. But environmental groups fear the ride of local communities to capture the entire nuclear caravaserraglio thereby helping to maintain a stalemate bad enough.
0 comments:
Post a Comment