The former chairman of the board attended a presentation of the Bologna book CLO "It's easy to say nuclear ". Clò's thesis at the end is that Italy and the atom split not meet again for ever more because of us (Italians) that because of the atom, but so, what has happened has happened and we farcene a reason.
The place of nuclear power has now taken the gas (always at the forefront of preferences Clo) does not make sense in economic and industrial return. And Prodi
do you think? The train nuclear
we lost him and when he missed a train is very difficult to run after him.
You have to run very strong. My position is very simple: how much? What are the uncertainties in the future? We need having surplus production capacity? We must respond to all these questions, then you can say yes or no. I was one of the few in the old days to vote in favor of nuclear power, because Italy had a capacity technique. Now that is gone, how much do it again? How many years does it take? Why do we need to ensure the safety of our citizens. You should never be theological in these things.
Well, I thank the professor to be able to summarize in a few lines issue and articulated a position so as to fade too many question marks in my book!
Even if I remembered stronger on the convenience of boarding the train EPR French
0 comments:
Post a Comment